Michael
Nelson practices exclusively in Criminal Defence and is
currently instructed in a number of cases that have
attracted nationwide publicity. Michael regularly leads
and works throughout the country.
Michael
gives regular lectures and is available to give in house
lectures with advance notice.
Principle Areas of Practice
Criminal commercial/ financial fraud
Serious crime including drugs, violence and human
traffic;
Financial and regulatory
Professional Associations
Criminal Bar Association
Free Representation Unit
Amnesty International, Lawyers Section
Other Associations
Member of the Tate Galleries
Friend of the Design Museum
Interests
Modern art, skiing.
Notable Cases
R v Cook and Others
Defence junior in a duty fraud case involving the
illegal importation of over 163 million cigarettes. At
the time, this was the biggest illegal importation of
tobacco into the United Kingdom. The estimated loss to
the Revenue was over £250 million.
R v Sansom & Others
‘ Operation New Barn’. Defence junior for the first
defendant in multi-handed conspiracy to supply cocaine.
The value of the cocaine was estimated in excess of
several hundred thousand pounds. One strand of the
defence was that the extensive use by the police of
covert listening and video devices was in breach of the
defendant’s human rights. This was heard before
Parliament enacted the Human Rights Act 1998.
R v Neill and Others
Defence junior for the first defendant in a case
alleging corruption in public office. After several
weeks of legal argument the Crown offered no evidence on
all 32 counts.
R v Oikonomopolous & Others
Defence for the first defendant in a conspiracy to
“import” 24 illegal immigrants secreted in the chassis
of a coach. This was the first such case involving the
channel tunnel.
R v Akpoveta & Others
‘ The London Rolex Robberies’. Defence for the first
defendant in a conspiracy to rob high-class jewellers on
Bond Street, Mayfair and Knightsbridge. The case
attracted a large amount of media attention.
R v Norton
Defence for the only defendant charged with two counts
of fraudulent trading, one count of obtaining by
deception and 16 counts of furnishing false information.
The allegation was that the defendant had deliberately
spent company money in order to provide for his lavish
lifestyle.